We are excited to share journal publications like this one resulting from FORWARD data. There are many more papers currently in development, and the future for Fragile X syndrome research is bright as more data is gathered.
This paper, published in the Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, addresses the difficulty of diagnosing autism in Fragile X syndrome. Although individuals with FXS are commonly diagnosed with ASD, it is a challenging diagnosis because intellectual disability and co-occurring mental health conditions can be interpreted as autistic features. Two commonly used standard measures, the Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) and the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), were examined as potential tools for improving ASD diagnosis and characterization in FXS. Researchers scientifically analyzed the SCQ and SRS and compared it to the standard DSM5 method used across clinicians to diagnose ASD in FXS. To improve diagnostic accuracy of ASD, various methodological revisions were applied to the SCQ and SRS in order to improve sensitivity and specificity of the measures.
Although the revised SCQ and SRS have an improved sensitivity/specificity balance and may be better suited for identifying ASD in males with lower cognitive function and irritability/aggression, the diagnostic accuracy of these measures is still below optimal levels, reflecting to some extent the inherent difficulty of diagnosing ASD in intellectual disability. This research suggests there are differences between the diagnosis of FXS and FXS+ASD. More work needs to be done to examine additional modifications, beyond deletion of non-informative items, that can further improve the diagnostic potential of the SCQ and SRS in FXS.
Kidd SA, et al. (2019). Improving the Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder in Fragile X Syndrome by Adapting the Social Communication Questionnaire and the Social Responsiveness Scale-2. J Autism Dev Disord. 2019, 1-20. doi: 10.1007/s10803-019-04148-0