Emotion Dysregulation in Fragile X Syndrome

Anna De Sonia
Anna De Sonia

06 mins read

Systematic Review: Emotion Dysregulation in Syndromic Causes of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Authors: Rebecca C. Shaffer, Debra L. Reisinger, Lauren M. Schmitt, Martine Lamy, Kelli C. Dominick, Elizabeth G. Smith, Marika C. Coffman, and Anna J. Esbensen[1]

Read the full article from the Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Summary

A large portion of individuals with Fragile X Syndrome (FXS) experience the inability to change how strongly they feel an emotional experience or how they respond to the experience, referred to as emotion dysregulation. Cincinnati Children’s Fragile X Center team reviewed the surrounding and relevant research conducted to examine emotion dysregulation in FXS and other genetic disorders commonly associated with intellectual disabilities to better understand the current state of the research.

Findings indicate emotion dysregulation in FXS can include irritability, temper tantrums, crankiness, reactivity, big reactions to small problems, anxiety, and verbal/ physical aggression. Due to the loss of the Fragile X protein, individuals with FXS demonstrate differences in their neural structures and function, including difficulties with sensory processing, social and emotional identification and processing, and executive function. Recent studies suggest that these neural changes can be a risk factor for emotion dysregulation. Additionally, research suggests that hyperexcitability in FXS may be a risk factor for emotion dysregulation.

Research for emotion dysregulation in FXS is relatively new. To date, only one current parent report form is being modified to be valid for use in the assessment of irritability in FXS. Currently, there are no research trials examining behavioral therapy for emotion dysregulation in FXS, but there have been some targeting pharmacological interventions. Atypical antipsychotics have been studied for the treatment of irritability, including the examination of aripiprazole which saw significant clinical improvements on outcomes measures.

Through this review, clear patterns were established, such as the FXS population with comorbid ASD demonstrate more self-injurious behaviors than in populations without the co-morbidities of FXS and ASD. The FXS population that has co-occurring ASD and intellectual disability (ID) showed the highest rates of aggression and irritability in comparison to those without these co-occurrences.

Why This Matters

This review gave us a better look at how emotion dysregulation presents in the FXS population, what this experience can look like for some with FXS and comorbid ASD, and suggestions for next steps to further explore emotion dysregulation in FXS. Further evidence discussed that while there is a wide range in symptoms manifested in ED, the FXS population experienced more anxiety symptoms when emotion dysregulation was present. It also raised the possibility that emotion dysregulation can play a role well into adulthood, with co-occurring conditions such as tremor/ataxia syndrome, though more information is needed about symptom stability into adulthood to get a clearer picture. While research into emotion dysregulation in FXS is new, the behaviors and difficulties associated with it are not. Many families cite symptoms like irritability, temper tantrums, crankiness, reactivity, big reactions to small problems, anxiety, and verbal/ physical aggression as major challenges. Understanding emotion dysregulation in FXS will help researchers and clinicians identify which treatments may be needed and support the development of those treatments.

Next Steps

Given that this review was broad across several genetic disorders commonly associated with intellectual disability, we must thoroughly examine individuals with FXS separately to get a better idea of the full picture of emotion dysregulation in FXS. Further, research needs to be expanded beyond youth with FXS to include the developmental lifespan. Similar to other behavioral challenges in FXS, emotion dysregulation will likely present differently across ages and require age-specific supports or interventions. Additionally, a common definition and assessment tool for emotion dysregulation is needed to better understand its impact in FXS and to consistently track outcomes across research trials. Lastly, a needed area of research is psychological interventions for emotion dysregulation outside of pharmacological trials for related symptoms.

About the Author

Anna De Sonia

Anna joined the NFXF team in 2024. She has many years of research experience, starting out as a clinical research coordinator at Rush University Medical Center in Chicago, IL back in 2010. There she worked on a variety of clinical trials in the pediatric neurology division, specializing in Fragile X research. 

References

1. Systematic Review: Emotion Dysregulation in Syndromic Causes of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 2022; 62, 518-557